South Carolina’s Fiscal Health
Three new reports offer a fresh glimpse into South Carolina’s fiscal health: the summative condition of South Carolina’s strategic financial position relative to assets, revenue and liabilities.
Talking about “fiscal health” may not make you the most popular guest at a cocktail party, but the fact is tax rates, spending levels, and debt levels are key to determining if our state is headed for tough times or a prosperous future.
Measuring South Carolina’s fiscal health enables us to answer questions like, “Can South Carolina keep its promises to retirees?,” “Is South Carolina able to shoulder short-term and long-term debts?,” and “Are South Carolina’s taxation and spending policies conducive to economic growth?”
Three recent studies that work to diagnose South Carolina’s current financial health:
Rich States, Poor States
The American Legislative Exchange Council’s annual report looks backwards at gross domestic product, migration statistics, and employment to determine an “economic performance rate”. It also provides an outlook to the future, based on 15 variables such as tax rates, union membership, and the cost of servicing debt.
South Carolina’s economic performance rank is 11th out of 50.
South Carolina’s economic outlook rank is 27th out of 50
The take-away message from this study is that while SC’s economy has rebounded since the recession and people are moving to SC to live and work, the Palmetto State’s economic outlook is hampered by the high progressivity of our tax code and the cost of servicing the state’s debt relative to tax revenue generated.
To read the complete study, click here.
Ranking the States by Fiscal Condition 2017
In their report, the Mercatus Center ranks the states against each other according to five benchmarks:
- Cash solvency: can South Carolina pay her short-term bills?
- Budget Solvency: Will South Carolina end the year in the black?
- Long-run Solvency: Does it look like South Carolina will be able to manage long-term liabilities?
- Service-level solvency: Will changes to the South Carolina’s tax and spend paradigm damage the economy?
- Trust fund solvency: How much debt is South Carolina in?
Compared to the other 49 states, South Carolina ranks 19th.
According to Mercatus, South Carolina has double what it needs to pay its short-term liabilities, our revenues exceed our expenses by 5 percent, and long-term liabilities are 28% of our total assets. That’s lower than average, but not low enough.
The Palmetto State struggles mightily in the Mercatus study on the trust fund solvency metric. Though the study reflects data that does not include the recently passed pension bill, we’ve explained before how shoveling more money into a fundamentally flawed system isn’t the type of reform we really need. There is no doubt that South Carolina’s pension system continues to be a millstone around the neck of our long-term fiscal health.
To read the compete study, click here.
Financial State of the State
Data and policy organization Truth in Accounting, differs from the first two studies by broadening the scope of inquiry beyond the Certified Annual Financial Report (CAFR). Consider their introduction:
“Through accounting gimmicks, government officials have been able to hide the true cost of government, playing tricks with the balance sheet and not accurately reporting pension and retiree health care debt.
States sink further into debt while keeping the budgets ‘balanced’ through tricks such as borrowing money to balance the budget, delaying the payment of current bills until the next fiscal year, and inflating revenue assumptions.”
Truth in Accounting’s methodology, therefore, includes studying whether South Carolina’s CAFR is an accurate financial picture or not. For example, South Carolina does not report retiree health care debt. Truth in Accounting found the following:
To read the complete study, click here.
The Bottom Line
Across the board, South Carolina consistently ranks in the middle of the pack when it comes to fiscal health. Though we aren’t careening toward bankruptcy like Illinois, California, and New Jersey, neither are we in the same financial position as our Southeastern neighbors – and closest economic competitors – like Tennessee and North Carolina.
It is clear that the states that are in the best financial position are the ones with pro-growth tax policies – low rates and a broad tax base that treat citizens fairly and don’t penalize business success. In addition, states that have failed to address long-term debt drivers like pension and health care costs are consistently in a worse position than states that have dealt with these difficult but critical financial issues.
These studies point to what we’ve argued many times before: structural pension reform and fundamental tax reform would not only ensure our fiscal health, but most importantly, position our state for maximum job-creating potential. And that means more opportunity for more South Carolinians.